ADM2209EARU Analog Devices Inc, ADM2209EARU Datasheet - Page 9

IC TXRX6/10 RS-232 12V 38TSSOP

ADM2209EARU

Manufacturer Part Number
ADM2209EARU
Description
IC TXRX6/10 RS-232 12V 38TSSOP
Manufacturer
Analog Devices Inc
Type
Transceiverr
Datasheet

Specifications of ADM2209EARU

Rohs Status
RoHS non-compliant
Number Of Drivers/receivers
6/10
Protocol
RS232
Voltage - Supply
10.8 V ~ 13.2 V
Mounting Type
Surface Mount
Package / Case
38-TSSOP

Available stocks

Company
Part Number
Manufacturer
Quantity
Price
Part Number:
ADM2209EARU
Manufacturer:
ADI/亚德诺
Quantity:
20 000
Part Number:
ADM2209EARUD
Manufacturer:
ADI/亚德诺
Quantity:
20 000
Part Number:
ADM2209EARUZ
Manufacturer:
ADI/亚德诺
Quantity:
20 000
Part Number:
ADM2209EARUZ-REEL7
Manufacturer:
BROADCOM
Quantity:
145
Part Number:
ADM2209EARUZ-REEL7
Manufacturer:
ADI/亚德诺
Quantity:
20 000
Company:
Part Number:
ADM2209EARUZ-REEL7
Quantity:
1 000
REV. 0
(Electrical Fast Transient) discharges. A simplified schematic of
the protection structure is shown in Figures 22a and 22b. Each
input and output contains two back-to-back high speed clamping
diodes. During normal operation with maximum RS-232 signal
levels, the diodes have no effect as one or the other is reverse-
biased, depending on the polarity of the signal. If, however, the
voltage exceeds about 50 V, reverse breakdown occurs and the
voltage is clamped at this level. The diodes are large p-n junctions
designed to handle the instantaneous current surge which can
exceed several amperes.
The transmitter outputs and receiver inputs have a similar pro-
tection structure. The receiver inputs can also dissipate some of
the energy through the internal 5 k resistor to GND as well as
through the protection diodes.
The protection structure achieves ESD protection up to 15 kV
and EFT protection up to 2 kV on all RS-232 I-O lines. The
methods used to test the protection scheme are discussed later.
ESD TESTING (IEC1000-4-2)
IEC1000-4-2 (previously 801-2) specifies compliance testing
using two coupling methods, contact discharge and air-gap
discharge. Contact discharge calls for a direct connection to the
unit being tested. Air-gap discharge uses a higher test voltage
but does not make direct contact with the unit under test. With
air discharge, the discharge gun is moved towards the unit un-
der test developing an arc across the air gap, hence the term air-
discharge. This method is influenced by humidity, temperature,
barometric pressure, distance and rate of closure of the discharge
gun. The contact-discharge method, while less realistic, is more
repeatable and is gaining acceptance in preference to the air-gap
method.
Although very little energy is contained within an ESD pulse,
the extremely fast rise time coupled with high voltages can cause
failures in unprotected semiconductors. Catastrophic destruc-
tion can occur immediately as a result of arcing or heating. Even
if catastrophic failure does not occur immediately, the device
may suffer from parametric degradation, which may result in
degraded performance. The cumulative effects of continuous
exposure can eventually lead to complete failure.
I-O lines are particularly vulnerable to ESD damage. Simply
touching or plugging in an I-O cable can result in a static dis-
charge that can damage or completely destroy the interface
Figure 22b. Transmitter Output Protection Scheme
Figure 22a. Receiver Input Protection Scheme
RECEIVER
INPUT
Tx
D1
D2
R
IN
D1
D2
TRANSMITTER
OUTPUT
Rx
–9–
product connected to the I-O port. Traditional ESD test meth-
ods such as the MIL-STD-883B method 3015.7 do not fully
test a product’s susceptibility to this type of discharge. This test
was intended to test a product’s susceptibility to ESD damage
during handling. Each pin is tested with respect to all other
pins. There are some important differences between the tradi-
tional test and the IEC test:
(a) The IEC test is much more stringent in terms of discharge
(b) The current rise time is significantly faster in the IEC test.
(c) The IEC test is carried out while power is applied to the device.
It is possible that the ESD discharge could induce latch-up in the
device under test. This test is therefore more representative of a
real-world I-O discharge where the equipment is operating nor-
mally with power applied. For maximum peace of mind, however,
both tests should be performed, to ensure maximum protection
both during handling and later, during field service.
Figure 24. Human Body Model ESD Current Waveform
energy. The peak current injected is over four times greater.
0.1 TO 1ns
Figure 25. IEC1000-4-2 ESD Current Waveform
36.8
100
GENERATOR
90
10
VOLTAGE
100
HIGH
90
10
t
RL
Figure 23. ESD Test Standards
ESD TEST METHOD
H. BODY MIL-STD-883B
IEC1000-4-2
30ns
R1
t
DL
C1
60ns
1.5k
330
R2
R2
150pF
ADM2209E
100pF
C1
TIME t
UNDER TEST
DEVICE
TIME t

Related parts for ADM2209EARU